There was a conversation recently in the Bastionland Discord about a Mythic Bastionland session which the referee felt didn't go well. It sounded like they had fought a climatic battle, won, played through the return journey to the nearest holding, but didn't have the best time with the events that the return travel triggered. Of course, only the people at that table know exactly how it went, and I'm not going to talk in depth about that game because I wasn't there. But it got me thinking about the balance between tension and downtime.
I've also been reading a sci fi novel recently, which has prompted some similar thoughts. Cowl by Neal Asher is about a conflict between time travelers. Characters, who initially don't know the factions involved, get drawn into the conflict. This isn't a review, but the book didn't really click with me. It felt like too many action / survival scenes without enough downtime to break them up. (It probably would've helped to read it over a couple of days rather than spreading it out over a few weeks.)
When I say "downtime", I don't necessarily mean characters hanging around in a town and learning a skill or upgrading weapons or whatever. I just mean a shift in the tension. There may still be important stakes, but with a change to the pace or the level of threat.
If you're writing a story you can just say Bilbo Baggins travelled home and skip across half of Middle-Earth. If you're playing an RPG, and the group wants to play through that journey, then you play through it. But it helps to be on the same page about what that means:
- Is a fresh journey, like the outward one, filled with random encounters?
- Is it a revisiting of those locations, maybe dealing with some consequences from before?
- Is it a quieter time, to spend some time with the characters and unpack what they've experienced?
I'm sure there are other possibilities too. My experience with the sci fi novel suggests to me that I don't want the next stage of most stories to have a similar texture to the last. I like the tension to have highs and lows, and to have changing circumstances.
The question this boils down to, in Mythic Bastionland, is "Do I ever want to turn off the Myths?"
Do I get to points in the game where I feel there is enough happening and don't want another injection of weirdness to proceedings?
I think my answer is "No, but".
I have never skipped a travel roll, or ignored an omen result on a travel roll. But I do check in with the players, asking if they want to travel to their next destination in the next session, or do a short time jump (days or weeks, maybe to the next festival) to start the session there. Another aspect of the "but" is that I have, once or twice, folded an omen into ongoing matters so that it is not an entirely new thread to pull on.
I consider all of the above to be playing rules as written. But, as a thought experiment, let's make up a house rule to handle things differently.
After a dramatic resolution, or a harsh defeat, or generally any time that the Company are ready to pack up and go home, make a single d6 roll for the entire multi-hex return journey:
1. The original purpose of the journey is still not resolved, and the Company come face to face with it. This may mean twisting the meaning of some earlier event.
2. The Company encounter a new troubling issue. Something unrelated to the outward journey's purpose. Maybe an Omen, or some crisis from the spark tables.
3. A sign of new trouble. Not directly encountered, but new information to consider at home. I'm thinking spark table dramas and crises rather than Mythic stuff.
4. Encounter a feature of the realm changed by your recent actions.
5. Same as 4.
6. Encounter a blessing, for example a character grateful for your recent actions.
After rolling, pick one of the hexes on the return journey to play out the result. These are pretty vague and would need to be fleshed out with spark table rolls.
